Do renewable fuels make our hamburger more expensive? Already since August
2006 public debate has intensified over the extent to which the expansion of the
ethanol industry has resulted in higher agricultural commodity prices.
Conventional wisdom and parrot-like communications have further clouded the
debate.
There is limited conclusive data available on market movements due to the
intensification of the ethanol business and most stories are based on anecdotal
information.
Assessment on the effect of ethanol
Informa Economics conducted an assessment on the subject, and the results
were released in December 2007.
Based on the American market, parts of the outcome could also be projected to
other developed markets in the world; if not now, then in the near future.
Main conclusion of the report: there is no
statistical proof that increases in corn prices have caused increases in food
prices. Only 4% of the increase in consumer prices could be explained by an
increase in corn prices. The market is far more complicated than that.
Lower harvests, stronger demands
There are a few market movements that have had a major
impact on the price developments. Since 2004 the US corn crop harvest has been
in decline. Since then the usage as corn for ethanol purposes has also increased
considerably.
Yet, the ethanol industry was not the only source of additional demand for
corn. US corn exports, rose to one of the highest levels of the previous decade.
Thus, the combination of a reduction in supply and an increase in demand from
both the ethanol industry and the export market led to corn prices moving higher
starting at the end of 2006.
Farm value of commodities
In the US the "farm value" of commodity raw materials used
in foods now accounts for 19% of total food costs, coming from 37% in 1973.
Depending on the ingredients used the average of 19% can vary considerably. The
US Department of Agriculture estimated that the farm value share of the retail
food price is 6% for cereals and bakery items, 47% for beef, 30% for pork, 36%
for dairy products and 17% for oils and fats.
Marketing bill determines price
What kills the food price is the so-called marketing bill, including the
costs of labour, packaging, transportation, energy, profits, advertising,
depreciation, rent, interest, repairs, business taxes and other costs not
attributable to basic agricultural commodities.
Within the overall marketing bill, the costs of energy and transportation
have increased considerably over the last several years, with crude oil prices
surging from just under $60 per barrel in autumn 2006 to $100 per barrel at the
end of 2007, the same period during which corn prices have increased.
Margins decline
Informa
analysed the historical price relationships between corn prices and livestock,
poultry, egg, and milk prices, and only found weak correlations. This implies
that based on real data it is wrong to suggest that high and/or rising corn
prices are the supposed reason behind high and rising retail meat, egg and milk
product prices.
However an increase in corn prices will cause livestock and poultry feeding
margins to be lower than they otherwise would have been. Cattle, pig and poultry
prices were already on the rise in the late 1990s, well before the corn price
began to increase significantly. Notably, dairy and egg prices have been driven
higher mainly by strong export demand.
Food in income expenditure
The proportion of the average American’s disposable income
that is spent on food has declined steadily over the last half-century, from 21%
of disposable income in 1950 to below 10% in 2006.
Additionally, in 1950 around 83% of the food expenditure was for home
consumption, but by 2006 this share had declined to 58%.
However prices for food consumed at home tend to be more volatile and are
currently growing more rapidly than away-from-home food prices, which of course
is logical. As a restaurant or take-away it is impossible to adapt your prices
to market volatilities.
No relief
According to
Bruce Scherr, CEO of Informa in an interview in Feedstuffs, there is no relief
in sight. Because much of the increase in prices is a result of world growth,
the only way to slow that significantly would be through war, pandemics or
chronic health issues.
Author: Dick Ziggers
Post a comment