A growing world population demands an increase in available animal protein
for human consumption. China is one of the countries that are rapidly
intensifying its livestock production for this need. However, food safety has to
be watched and improved says Nathan Bird.

Intensive agriculture brings an extended food chain. In the recent past
pigs, poultry and even fish were raised by home farms meeting an individual or
very local demand. In many parts of China this is still the situation. Driven by
rapid urbanisation, a need for a more intensive approach to meat production has
developed to supply a more concentrated consumer base. This has split animal
production into two channels. The first channel remains as small local farming
communities selling produce locally and there is a social responsibility to
maintain and improve this way of life for what is a vast farming population.
The second channel is comprised of large local or
multinational companies with heavy investment in breeding, feeding and
processing. What once were small farms focused on supplying their local
community, has grown rapidly into being an industry supplying fast food chains,
supermarkets and an increasingly educated consumer base. If we consider the food
chain, there are many steps and different production models. Figure 1
shows a typical Chinese model and Figure 2
represents a typical US/ European model. To assess a food safety risk analysis
we can consider the chain in 8 basic steps. These will be explained in short
below.

Micronutrients production
It is
necessary to provide micronutrients to intensively raised animals. Nutrients
such as vitamins, carotenoids, amino acids, trace elements and minerals must all
be added to the feed. These come primarily from two sources. The first is large
scale chemical manufacture or fermentation (vitamins, carotenoids and amino
acids). Typically, companies providing such materials manufacture for the food,
pharmaceutical and animal feed indus- tries in high tech (normally GMP)
facilities.
Product forms are developed to ensure that small quantities of active
nutrient can be effectively added and retain its stability in animal feed.
Specifications and quality systems are normally extremely high. The other source
is from harvesting natural resources (minerals and trace elements) and quality
is managed through identifying possible contaminants and maintaining tight
specifications to prevent these from entering the food chain (for example,
Cadmium in Zinc sources). Responsibility for such control measures rests largely
with premix manufacturers.

Micronutrient premixing
Micronutrients are by definition, supplied in very small
quantities in animal feed. For example, biotin, an essential vitamin is required
at levels of approximately 150- 200 ppb and must be evenly distributed in the
animal feed. Therefore, such micronutrients must first be premixed into a
diluted form. This is perhaps the most critical control point in animal feed
production due to the high number of micronutrients combined into one premixed
package. Whilst making up approximately 1% of the feed volume, premixes can
contain up to 70% or more of the individual feed components. There is now rapid
development of the Chinese premix industry, and only in recent years do we see
large scale dedicated premix plants emerging. There is now a drive for these
plants to be HACCP or ISO-22000 accredited to ensure risks are identified and
preventive steps are taken to ensure no contamination into the food chain.
Traceability is probably the single most critical factor in the production of
premix. With traceability comes risk assessment and attention to
specifications.
Raw material supply (Macronutrients)
Macronutrients such as protein and
energy are normally provided by raw materials such as corn, soybean, fish meal
etc. The risks associated with these materials often come to the forefront of
the animal feeding industry, such as the BSE and recently the adulteration of
proteins sources with Melamine. Industry and authorities both reacted quickly in
these cases however both issues did considerable damage to the perception of
industry in the eyes of consumers and very high financial impact to the
companies involved. Again, these issues relate primarily to failure in
controlling specifications and traceability.
Feed production
The production of
feed takes many routes and in this respect is also a critical point of control
for food safety. The commercial feed industry in China is developing into one of
the largest globally, but there remains a significant gap between the number of
animals produced and the quantity of feed commercially produced. This gap is
made up by an extensive production of feed “on farm”. Farmers will buy a
commercial feed premix and add corn, soybean and other raw materials themselves.
Control of this process can be viewed as a relatively high risk. There are
significant differences in “on farm” feed production depending on the animal
species being raised.
The majority of
meat chickens are supplied fully commercial feed, due to the higher level of
integration with- in this industry. Within integrated production (baby chick ¬
feed ¬ meat ¬ processing) there are control points and much product is sold
branded giving a reference point for traceability. A significant amount of feed
for laying hens and pigs is produced on farm representing the need for education
of farmers as to best safe practice. Such products are normally sold unbranded
in open markets so traceability of the foodstuff is also an issue. Projects run
by the relevant Ministries are focusing on evaluation of feed additives and the
controls for ensuring relevant regulations are adhered to.
Animal feeding
Many integrated
producers control animal feeding through either having their own units or
contract production with accredited farmers. Traceability systems and controls
are developing as the industry matures and recognisable standards such as HACCP
are implemented. Community farming units in China are typically small and
farmers have been adapting to modern agriculture on the foundation of techniques
passed down through generations. Newer challenges face these farmers (free
availability of drugs, availability of non-permitted substances such as Sudan IV
or clenbuterol and numerous emerging disease challenges such as Avian Influenza
and Swine Blue ear disease).

Nathan Bird studied at Canterbury University in New Zealand. In 1990 he
finished his Ph.D in nutrition. From 1990 until 2003, Nathan was animal
nutrition manager and technical manager at several offices from Roche. In 2003,
he joined DSM China Limited as Animal Nutrition Manager for China.
Continuous education to lift the standard farm practices is a key for the future
controls of food safety on the farm. The government is supporting such
programmes under the umbrella of the “harmonious society” programme to improve
the living standards of rural communities across the country. This will offer
educational opportunities however, it remains is a significant mindset
challenge.
Processing
All industries are now
experiencing a dramatic rise of further processing of animals. This can simply
be by defining slaughter houses right through to fully branded products sold in
western style packaging. This is a very steep development curve as it was only
10 years ago that the majority of animal products were sold live or freshly
slaughtered in open market environments. Fast food and supermarket chains are
also driving this development with international standards. Investment is
significant and brand security through food safety is also a key driver for
ensuring the controlled operation of such processing facilities.
Marketing
Food safety is now a key target for successful branding of
agri-products in China. Numerous brands approach the market with HACCP
accreditations, environmentally sound production processes and premium
| Fixing China’s bad image |
| After
some feed scares, including melamine in wheat gluten and Sudan Red dye, China’s main focus at the moment is to
fix its image of being a low quality supplier of meat, seafood, vegetables
and raw materials. Inspections of pork production are being intensified
and China’s quality watchdog introduced a recall system for unsafe food
products to improve product safety. Minister of Agriculture Sun Zhengcai
promised stiff action against farmers and producers who used banned
chemicals to boost yields and profits. Among targeted practices will be
use of chloramphenicol, malachite green and other potentially toxic banned
chemicals in raising seafood. Sun also promised an offensive against
banned additives in animal feed and pet
food. |
product ranges. Major local and international retailers are now carrying
“own branded” meat products with the appropriate traceability behind the
production. Consumers are also looking to brands to provide traceability
security. In a recent survey conducted by DSM the willingness to purchase
branded eggs was 67.8% (and 76.2% for an OVN® egg brands) in the open markets,
where there are currently no such brands.
Key drivers were quality, freshness and safety. This represents a shift
in consumer perception that branded agriproducts only belong in the supermarket.
Consumer perception has clearly shifted from “branded products are premium
products”, to a more pragmatic approach that “branded products are traceable
products”. This is a very positive and encouraging sign because consumers’
increasing need to understand food safety will ultimately drive the upstream
home based industry.
Consumption
The Chinese consumer
is becoming more knowledgeable and has more information available regarding
animal raising practices than ever before. Media has played an important role by
not only reporting on contraventions of food safety practices, but also widely
publicising positive moves in the industry (such as investment in processing
lines or attainment of HACCP accreditations).
Systems and Culture
Safety is a culture. Whether we discuss food safety
or the way we cross the road each day, the most critical issue for successful
implementation of food safety is personal culture of individuals. At the same
time, regulators can limit the “decision risk” which may lead individual actions
inappropriate for best practice. Adequate monitoring and education systems can
help to bring about this cultural change. Eating habits and consumer maturity is
also driving this change in China. <-
This article was presented at the Food Safety and Public
Policy
International Seminar which was held in
Shanghai from November 14-16, 2007
Source: Feed Mix Volume 16 No.01