fbpx

Sorghum has been deteriorating for 6,000 years

10-04-2019 | |
Photot: Henk Riswick
Photot: Henk Riswick

Sorghum, a cereal used to feed livestock and make alcohol has been damaged over the last 6,000 years by humans, researchers from the University of Warwick in the UK says.

The researchers address in a new paper, published in the Journal Nature Plant, that to maintain the diversity of the crop and keep it growing, farmers will need to revise how they manage it.

Repair the crops genomic damage

The history of sorghum from its original domesticated state to today’s domesticated cereal has been found to be heavily influenced by human action, continuing to treat the plant as we currently do could mean the continued degradation of the crop.

One current type of sorghum harvested is called sorghum bicolor, but there are several different sorghum types, and in the past they have been saving each other by sharing undamaged genes, in a process called introgression. The wild ancestors of sorghum represent genomes that have not been damaged through cultivation. Although we don’t harvest the wild ancestors of sorghum it’s necessary to keep them alive as the ability to adapt to their surroundings by introgression could be crucial in the future of sorghum bicolor to threats of climate change, meaning crops have to adapt to new environments.

In sorghum bicolor, damage to their genes is happening by the way it’s farmed, meaning their core genome functions are accumulating damage over time, therefore we need to repair the crops’ genomic damage or productivity could decline.

Risk of less animal feed

Professor Robin Allaby, from the School of Life Sciences at the University of Warwick comments: “Sorghum bicolor is the world’s fifth most important cereal crop and the most important crop in arid zones. It’s used for animal feed and beer and is grown particularly in North Eastern Africa, generating an economy there. If we can’t save sorghum’s ancestors and use those genes to help sorghum bicolor repair its genomic damage we could risk damaging the crop further. This could mean less animal feed, food and beer, as well as potentially damaging trade in North East Africa.”

Join 26,000+ subscribers

Subscribe to our newsletter to stay updated about all the need-to-know content in the feed sector, three times a week.
Koeleman
Emmy Koeleman Freelance editor





Beheer