An ecocentric or a technocentric approach? What is the future for agriculture and which approach can feed the world better? Probably a mixture of both, although that is a challenging mission, says Joris Lohman, co-founder of Food Hub. Mr Lohman will be speaking at the upcoming Global Future Farming Summit.
Food Hub is based in Amsterdam, the Netherlands and was founded 3 years ago by Joris Lohman and his business partner. The company connects companies, businesses, governments and other key stakeholders to enable people to change the world of food. This is done through education programmes and training courses for example. Mr Lohman has noticed over the years, that although the food production chain deals with many steps, all the different key players in the food chain, like farmers and retailers, often operate and focus on themselves. But it is time to end solo mentality in the agrofood chain and Food Hub wants to facilitate this. In the run-up to the Global Future Farming Summit, we talked to Mr Lohman about his vision and view on what is needed to do this.
“If we look back on let’s say 150 years of agriculture, we see that it has its basis in a farming system that combined city and farmland. With urbanisation, farms and cities became more divided and the farmers started to focus on efficiency and growth, fuelled by the introduction and availability of new farming techniques, tractors, chemical fertilisers and crop protection substances after the second World War. This led to a quick transformation of the European farming system, from a small scale and labour intensive sector to a modern, large scale and efficient system. Although praised by many, this system also created problems such as excessive CO2 output, manure and other waste streams. Now we have reached a point to question whether this is the way forward and how we should do things differently.”
“The problem is that the agrofood chain has become a linear system when it became more technological, bigger and focused on production and efficiency. This means that it uses a lot of raw materials and nutrients, and although converted to high quality animal protein products, this system also produces a lot of waste. A linear system is by definition not a circular or sustainable system. Although I also want to address that a 100% circular system is not possible, but getting as close as possible is the way we need to go in the future. This is also for example what the Netherlands wants to focus on, as stated by the Dutch Agricultural Minister recently. Circular agriculture does not mean that we will return to small scale farming. It means that we still aim for high yields (and produce enough food to feed the world), but at the same time be as conscious as possible of what we use in terms of resources and that we make optimal use of waste streams for example. A circular agriculture should have as little pressure on the environment and climate as possible.”
“Yes, maybe we have to, but that is easier said than done. What we see today is that there are 2 camps forming. On one side we have the technology advocates that still aim for growth and more efficiency. On the other side we see people that want food production on a small scale, with a stronger connection between farm and nature and according to ecological philosophies. The technology people believe in efficient farming that is seen in Europe and North America for example. But the real discussions are often about the underlying topics such as GMO. Topics like these are complicated to get a consensus on, as the views on such topics are often deeply rooted in a person’s principles and feelings. In the debate of farming more circular and more sustainable, we try to look at how we can unite these 2 groups. Can we take the best of both worlds and where can we learn from each other? We need be less narrow-minded and think more in ‘systems’. This demands people who think differently and want to cooperate more. I believe that many problems, for example regarding food waste, can be solved by doing this. Dealing with the ‘technologics’ and the ‘ecologics’ creates an interesting dynamic. I also want to address that technological advancements are great and can certainly help agriculture to move forward. But it is key to implement techniques in the right way and also realise that techniques are not the single solution for a sustainable agrofood system.”
“At the summit I want to challenge the audience about the 2 different views of how to feed the world and raise the question if we can combine elements of both to come to a ‘new’ type of farming that is both tech savvy and also sustainable and circular. I want to address that there are different views on how agriculture should look like in the future and that we should be aware of how we bring these views to the public and also think which view we want to share. I think there will be more ‘technologics’ than ‘ecologics’ in the audience of the summit, so I am looking forward to hearing their thoughts on the future of farming and to have a good discussion about it and maybe challenge them with some of the elements that are more small-scale based. One thing is clear, we need to change and we need to create a new story about how food is and will be produced.”
Be part of the future, be part of the Global Future Farming Summit!
On 6-7 November, 2018, leading experts in the agrifood industry come together in at the campus of Wageningen University and Research Centre in the Netherlands. The programme consists of a high level summit and an experience tour. Some of the keynote speakers at the summit include: Claudia Roessler from Microsoft, Deborah Nas, Professor Innovation at the technical University Delft, the Netherlands, Sebastiaan Berendse, Director Value Creation Wageningen University & Research, Yasir Khokhar from AI company Connecterra, Vik Vandecavaye, Manager Advanced Data Analysis and Application Development at CNH Belgium and Ros Harvey, founder and Managing Director, The Yield, Australia. Register now to secure your seat! There are limited spaces available.