WDGS is a common ethanol byproduct that could replace more costly traditional feed ingredients such as corn, soybean meal, urea, and mineral supplements, says ARS.
WDGS typically costs about 10% less than corn when used as livestock feed.
ARS scientists at the US Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC) in Clay Center, Nebraska, have studied the effects of feeding WDGS to cattle.
Four areas were investigated: feedlot performance, energy utilization efficiency, postharvest meat characteristics, and cattle manure emissions.
In one study, nutritionist Calvin Ferrell and food technologist Steven Shackelford monitored growth rate, feed intake, and feed efficiency for cattle in the "finishing phase"-the approximately 120 to 140 days leading up to slaughter.
They found that in steers fed diets of 20 to 40% WDGS, performance in those areas was equal to or better than that of a group of cattle that did not receive the WDGS.
Another study, led by animal scientist Mindy Spiehs, took a closer look at feed efficiency by examining how much heat animals produced while digesting their food.
Spiehs and her colleagues observed no significant difference in heat production between cattle fed 0, 20, 40, or 60% WDGS.
But they did see lower energy utilization efficiency at the highest rate, a factor that could reduce feedlot performance.
Looking at meat quality, Shackelford, research leader Tommy Wheeler and food technologist Andy King found that feeding a diet of 20 or 40% WDGS produced carcasses that were the same or better for yield and quality traits than carcasses of cattle that did not eat the WDGS.
Cattle fed 60% WDGS diets were lighter, leaner, less marbled, and had lower yield grades than cattle in the groups that consumed lower quantities of WDGS or none at all.
Microbiologist Vince Varel confirmed that as the concentration of WDGS increased in the diet, greater concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulphur appeared in manure, mostly due to excess crude protein.